ChampsRankELO – Dec. 14, 2025

This is the third iteration of the ChampsRankELO ranking report. An explanation of the methodology can be found here.

Note: In the next few days, the rankings will be updated automatically.

Click here to view our other Dec. 14th ranking: ChampsRankSOS

ChampsRankELO: DI Women’s College Hockey

as of December 14, 2025

RankTeamELO RatingGames Played
1Wisconsin170020
2Ohio State165118
3Penn State164018
4UConn162118
5Princeton162115
6Northeastern161619
7Minnesota160718
8Minnesota Duluth158918
9Quinnipiac157820
10Clarkson156519
11Minnesota State153820
12Mercyhurst153422
13Yale153016
14St. Cloud State152520
15Cornell151916
16Holy Cross151821
17Colgate151620
18Franklin Pierce151419
19St. Lawrence150521
20RIT150422
21Boston College150320
22Maine149420
23New Hampshire149121
24Vermont148920
25Robert Morris148824
26Brown148616
27Union148320
28Boston University148218
29Harvard148114
30Providence146519
31St. Thomas146120
32Stonehill145919
33Syracuse145822
34Saint Anselm145720
35Assumption145620
36RPI144921
37Dartmouth144316
38Lindenwood143222
39Bemidji State142618
40Merrimack140518
41LIU139818
42Post139520
43Sacred Heart135918
44Delaware135120
45Saint Michaels128316

ChampsRankELO Rankings Comparison: December 7 vs December 14, 2025

The ChampsRankELO rankings were stable in positions, with all top 10 teams holding their spots from December 7 to December 14. However, every team in the top 10 saw rating declines, reflecting the time-decay model’s gradual reduction of older game weights. Wisconsin remains #1 but dropped from 1718 to 1700.39 ELO points, while Ohio State held #2 but fell from 1664 to 1650.98. Penn State stayed at #3 (1646 → 1639.98), and the tight race between Princeton (#4, 1633 → 1621.01) and UConn (#5, 1632 → 1621.30) narrowed to 0.29 ELO points. The consistent downward trend across all teams suggests that the limited game activity between December 7–14 (only five games completed, none involving top-ranked teams) allowed the time-decay mechanism to reduce the weight of older results without new competitive outcomes to offset the decline.

The middle rankings (6–10) followed the same pattern, with Northeastern (#6, 1625 → 1616.07), Minnesota (#7, 1616 → 1607.47), Minnesota Duluth (#8, 1598 → 1589.43), Quinnipiac (#9, 1584 → 1578.41), and Clarkson (#10, 1569 → 1565.48) all experiencing modest rating decreases while maintaining their positions. The ELO system’s sequential processing and time-decay mechanism mean that without new games to process, teams’ ratings naturally decline as older games lose weight. This week’s sparse schedule, combined with the fact that the few games played (involving Dartmouth, Robert Morris, LIU, Saint Anselm, Saint Michaels, Brown, and Yale) didn’t involve any top-ranked teams, explains why the rankings remained static in terms of positions but showed uniform rating decreases across the board.

Got feedback on the ChampsRankELO model? Submit feedback here

Comments are closed.